Skip to content

Incident Radar

Incident Radar answers a question a queue cannot: is this one problem or twenty? It groups similar tickets into clusters, so a mass outage appears as one incident instead of a hundred unread rows.

Incident Radar page in English with the portal selector, the alert banner and the review counters.

The counters summarise the queues; the list below them is scoped to the selected ServiceDesk Plus portal.

TermMeaning
IncidentA cluster of tickets judged similar enough to be one problem.
Similarity thresholdThe similarity above which a ticket joins a cluster; configured under Incident Detection.
Review queueNeeds review, In progress, Watching — where a technician decides what a cluster actually is.
Reference ticketThe ticket you start from when you ask “what else looks like this?”
  1. Tickets are compared pairwise or against existing clusters using the ticket index vectors.
  2. Pairs above the threshold are grouped.
  3. A cluster becomes an incident with a status and a set of member tickets.
  4. The queues surface new clusters (Needs review), ones being handled (In progress), and ones being observed (Watching).
  5. A cluster can feed a workflow — an incident summary, an alert, or an automatic task.

Clustering is a suggestion, not a verdict. Two tickets can be textually similar and operationally unrelated (the same VPN error for two different reasons), and a cluster can miss a real incident when the phrasing differs enough.

  1. Select the portal. Detection scope is per portal; a cluster in another portal is not visible here.
  2. Open Needs review and read the cluster members before promoting anything.
  3. Confirm or dismiss: a confirmed cluster becomes an incident others can act on.
  4. Move a confirmed incident to In progress while it is being handled, and to Watching when it is being monitored for recurrence.
  5. Use the reference-ticket search when you suspect an incident that was never auto-clustered.

The threshold lives in Incident Detection:

  • Too low → unrelated tickets merge; reviewers lose trust and stop reading the queue.
  • Too high → real incidents never form, and the queue stays empty while users complain.

Tune against real history: pick two known incidents and two known non-incidents, and check which threshold separates them.

  • Empty queue → no cluster crossed the threshold in scope; not proof that no incident exists.
  • Sparse index → clustering needs indexed tickets; an unindexed portal produces nothing.
  • Delayed detection → new tickets enter the index asynchronously, so a very fresh burst may take time to cluster.
  • Cluster drift → as members are added, the representative text changes; re-read the members before acting.
  • Scope mismatch → the portal selector and the detection scope must agree.

Incident Detection · Ticket Search · Search index health · Enterprise Audit